The Colorado Retirement System has made the following statement to their Legislators. These are the same points that PERI has been making to Ohio's legislators.
We are urging every PERI member to communicate with their representatives and let them know how you feel about their attempt to interfere with your personal pension fund investments and retirement benefits, by legislating that the duly elected retiement system trustees and staff, have to waste one minute of their time, energy, and focus on furthering any political position.
We start from the premise that there are occurrences of violence in today's world that are and should be intolerable in any civilized community. In addition, there are causes being pursued by interest groups that could greatly affect such critical issues as our environment, public health, the working conditions of persons throughout the world and even the global threat of terrorism. As individual Americans we all enjoy the political and philosophical freedom to speak out against the atrocities and join in those causes which align with our personal beliefs. As an organization, however, PERA serves the singular purpose of operating the retirement system serving more than 400,000 current and former public servants. PERA does not have the authority to determine social policy, foreign policy, economic policy, or any other policy beyond the operation of the retirement system.
It is commendable that the Colorado General Assembly would consider adding its voice to those striving to address complex issues in today's world. PERA cannot and does not quarrel with that body's laudable goals. However, in considering issues of divestment, the General Assembly must also be cognizant of the following:
First, in meeting its fiduciary responsibilities, PERA seeks to maximize long term risk-adjusted investment returns while incorporating the fund's liability characteristics. A central component in managing investment risk is diversification. Security prices usually reflect and are dependent upon many factors, including economic, political, environmental, industry and company specific risks. PERA does not make investment decisions based on any one singular factor. Consideration, when applicable, is given to business presence in sensitive geopolitical areas, environmental compliance risks, sanction risks, and other economic, financial and company specific risks. Every day PERA and its investment managers prudently assume investment risk in seeking to maximize long term investment returns while incorporating the fund's liability requirements, in an ongoing effort to secure the retirement benefits promised to public servants throughout Colorado. Divestment, by its nature, adversely affects diversification.
Second, ordering divestment comes with significant associated costs. Those costs include the cost to search for and certify those entities that may have the characteristics or affiliations targeted by a divestment effort; the transaction costs that will be incurred in selling or disposing of securities; the cost of researching and conducting due diligence for any replacement securities or funds; the lost opportunity cost; the cost of reduced investment return; and the cost of creating investment strategies that exclude such entities.
Third, the money administered by PERA, whether received through investment returns, employee contributions, or employer contributions immediately becomes part of a trust fund. This means that money transferred to PERA is no longer "public money" or "state money." Such money is paid as compensation pursuant to employment contracts and agreements between employers and employees and is considered earned at the time of transfer, just as employees who invest in defined contribution retirement plans retain ownership over the funds they have invested. Thus any divestment directive affects money that is not the property of the state or any other public employer, and in the case of the employee's contributions and investment returns, never was.
Fourth, the trust fund must be administered by the PERA trustees, who have a fiduciary duty to invest and expend those funds for the sole and exclusive benefit of the members and beneficiaries. Trustees cannot allow financial decisions that would undermine the funded status of the plan. In order to protect and preserve members' assets, state dollars should be used to reimburse PERA for the initial and ongoing costs and potential losses of any mandated divestment effort. Such an approach would spread the cost to all Colorado taxpayers, and would add the voice of the entire state's citizenry to the call for action.
Fifth, the activities of a company that trigger a divestment mandate may constitute a very small fraction of the company's total global operations. Frequently the companies in question are multinational with primary headquarters in friendly foreign nations and significant operations in the United States, and even here in Colorado. Divestment mandates are designed to impose economic hardship on the subject companies but there is no assurance where the impact of that pressure will be felt. Widespread divestment could (and is intended to) impair the economic resources required for a company to operate, potentially resulting in an array of unintended consequences.
The variety of issues facing our world today are not easily separated in to gradations of severity or importance. Consensus as to the priority of these types of issues and the proper recourse are difficult to achieve. As a result, once a divestment mandate is imposed to address one issue, the resulting "slippery slope" makes differentiation among the remaining issues contentious and divisive.
